We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.ME

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: Principal Component Analysis and biplots. A Back-to-Basics Comparison of Implementations

Abstract: Principal Component Analysis and biplots are so well-established and readily implemented that it is just too tempting to give for granted their internal workings. In this note I get back to basics in comparing how PCA and biplots are implemented in base-R and contributed R packages, leveraging an implementation-agnostic understanding of the computational structure of each technique. I do so with a view to illustrating discrepancies that users might find elusive, as these arise from seemingly innocuous computational choices made under the hood. The proposed evaluation grid elevates aspects that are usually disregarded, including relationships that should hold if the computational rationale underpinning each technique is followed correctly. Strikingly, what is expected from these equivalences rarely follows without caveats from the output of specific implementations alone.
Comments: Preprint. 20 pages, 3 figure, 5 tables. Currently submitted to the R Journal
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
MSC classes: 62H25
Cite as: arXiv:2404.15115 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2404.15115v1 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Ettore Settanni [view email]
[v1] Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:10:00 GMT (94kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.