We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.ME

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: A comparison of the discrimination performance of lasso and maximum likelihood estimation in logistic regression model

Abstract: Logistic regression is widely used in many areas of knowledge. Several works compare the performance of lasso and maximum likelihood estimation in logistic regression. However, part of these works do not perform simulation studies and the remaining ones do not consider scenarios in which the ratio of the number of covariates to sample size is high. In this work, we compare the discrimination performance of lasso and maximum likelihood estimation in logistic regression using simulation studies and applications. Variable selection is done both by lasso and by stepwise when maximum likelihood estimation is used. We consider a wide range of values for the ratio of the number of covariates to sample size. The main conclusion of the work is that lasso has a better discrimination performance than maximum likelihood estimation when the ratio of the number of covariates to sample size is high.
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME); Computation (stat.CO)
Cite as: arXiv:2404.17482 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2404.17482v1 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Gustavo Pereira [view email]
[v1] Fri, 26 Apr 2024 15:31:57 GMT (25kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.