We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs.CY

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Computer Science > Computers and Society

Title: Silencing the Risk, Not the Whistle: A Semi-automated Text Sanitization Tool for Mitigating the Risk of Whistleblower Re-Identification

Abstract: Whistleblowing is essential for ensuring transparency and accountability in both public and private sectors. However, (potential) whistleblowers often fear or face retaliation, even when reporting anonymously. The specific content of their disclosures and their distinct writing style may re-identify them as the source. Legal measures, such as the EU WBD, are limited in their scope and effectiveness. Therefore, computational methods to prevent re-identification are important complementary tools for encouraging whistleblowers to come forward. However, current text sanitization tools follow a one-size-fits-all approach and take an overly limited view of anonymity. They aim to mitigate identification risk by replacing typical high-risk words (such as person names and other NE labels) and combinations thereof with placeholders. Such an approach, however, is inadequate for the whistleblowing scenario since it neglects further re-identification potential in textual features, including writing style. Therefore, we propose, implement, and evaluate a novel classification and mitigation strategy for rewriting texts that involves the whistleblower in the assessment of the risk and utility. Our prototypical tool semi-automatically evaluates risk at the word/term level and applies risk-adapted anonymization techniques to produce a grammatically disjointed yet appropriately sanitized text. We then use a LLM that we fine-tuned for paraphrasing to render this text coherent and style-neutral. We evaluate our tool's effectiveness using court cases from the ECHR and excerpts from a real-world whistleblower testimony and measure the protection against authorship attribution (AA) attacks and utility loss statistically using the popular IMDb62 movie reviews dataset. Our method can significantly reduce AA accuracy from 98.81% to 31.22%, while preserving up to 73.1% of the original content's semantics.
Comments: Accepted for publication at the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2024 (ACM FAccT'24). This is a preprint manuscript (authors' own version before final copy-editing)
Subjects: Computers and Society (cs.CY); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
ACM classes: H.3; K.4; H.5; K.5; D.2; J.4
DOI: 10.1145/3630106.3658936
Cite as: arXiv:2405.01097 [cs.CY]
  (or arXiv:2405.01097v1 [cs.CY] for this version)

Submission history

From: Dimitri Staufer [view email]
[v1] Thu, 2 May 2024 08:52:29 GMT (12839kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.