We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs.AR

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Computer Science > Hardware Architecture

Title: A Comparative Analysis of Microrings Based Incoherent Photonic GEMM Accelerators

Abstract: Several microring resonator (MRR) based analog photonic architectures have been proposed to accelerate general matrix-matrix multiplications (GEMMs) in deep neural networks with exceptional throughput and energy efficiency. To implement GEMM functions, these MRR-based architectures, in general, manipulate optical signals in five different ways: (i) Splitting (copying) of multiple optical signals to achieve a certain fan-out, (ii) Aggregation (multiplexing) of multiple optical signals to achieve a certain fan-in, (iii) Modulation of optical signals to imprint input values onto analog signal amplitude, (iv) Weighting of modulated optical signals to achieve analog input-weight multiplication, (v) Summation of optical signals. The MRR-based GEMM accelerators undertake the first four ways of signal manipulation in an arbitrary order ignoring the possible impact of the order of these manipulations on their performance. In this paper, we conduct a detailed analysis of accelerator organizations with three different orders of these manipulations: (1) Modulation-Aggregation-Splitting-Weighting (MASW), (2) Aggregation-Splitting-Modulation-Weighting (ASMW), and (3) Splitting-Modulation-Weighting-Aggregation (SMWA). We show that these organizations affect the crosstalk noise and optical signal losses in different magnitudes, which renders these organizations with different levels of processing parallelism at the circuit level, and different magnitudes of throughput and energy-area efficiency at the system level. Our evaluation results for four CNN models show that SMWA organization achieves up to 4.4$\times$, 5$\times$, and 5.2$\times$ better throughput, energy efficiency, and area-energy efficiency, respectively, compared to ASMW and MASW organizations on average.
Comments: To Appear at ISQED 2024
Subjects: Hardware Architecture (cs.AR); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE)
Cite as: arXiv:2402.03149 [cs.AR]
  (or arXiv:2402.03149v3 [cs.AR] for this version)

Submission history

From: Sairam Sri Vatsavai [view email]
[v1] Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:16:17 GMT (2968kb,D)
[v2] Wed, 7 Feb 2024 22:32:03 GMT (2968kb,D)
[v3] Fri, 16 Feb 2024 19:38:18 GMT (2967kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.